Talk:Masovian Voivodeship

How about another picture?

We have two pictures focusing only on the modern Warsaw. How about another town in Mazowsze, or a nature pic? Bug river or smthg? Ksenon 16:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move to Masovian Voivodeship. -- Kjkolb 23:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am formally requesting that this article be moved from Masovia Voivodeship to Masovian Voivodeship, to make it consistent with the other voivodeship articles such as Silesian Voivodeship and Pomeranian Voivodeship. --Elonka 15:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support, wholeheartedly. But on a personal note, don't you think that your recent mass moving spree is exactly what you criticised in Piotrus' behaviour? //Halibu tt 18:47, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, because there was a clear consensus at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Geography of Poland. In most cases, I was simply moving pages back to the English names that they'd been at, before Logologist moved them to Polish. In general, the English name was usually still on the article, because often he had just moved the article itself to a new name, but hadn't bothered changing the actual text or section headers of the article. I also used "What links here" to help determine what the most common usage was from other Wikipedia articles that were linking to the page, and that too was often a clear doublecheck of what "most common usage in English" was. In the cases where it's ambiguous (like I'll freely admit that Podlachian Voivodeship was a tough call), I made my best good faith determination (for example, I reviewed the related page at Podlachia), but if there's genuine concern from other editors, I am fine on doublechecking consensus on the appropriate article talk pages. In summary, I don't really care what the article titles are, be they English "Silesian" or Polish "Lodz", I just want to make sure that there's clear cross-cultural community consensus for it. --Elonka 21:34, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support, as nominator. --Elonka 15:20, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Founding of Masovia Name?

Hello, I am a Pole and I am surprised with the last line in section "Most popular surnames in the region":

  4. Mazurkiewicz: Founding of Masovia Name.

I cannot see in what sense could the surname Mazurkiewicz be "founding of Masovia name". The only morphological connection easily seen is Mazur-k-iew-icz, regarding neighbouring Mazury region (so, the "meaning" of Mazurkiewicz would be perhaps a descendant of a small person from Mazury?), not Masovia. And also it seems most probable that Mazurkiewicz is derived from Mazury, not the other way. But what I say is just of my reason, not of specialist knowledge.

If the sentence quoted has any sense, it would be fine to make it clearer and link some source.

Best regards! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.36.12.248 (talk) 16:09, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two parts

"It currently has the lowest unemployment rate in Poland and is classified as a very high income province" - Warsaw metropolitan area is rich, external parts of the region aren't, PiS proposed to divide the voivodeship into two ones.Xx236 (talk) 08:19, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that is true that the sub-governments (samorządy) around Warsaw and generally in the voivodeship are much poorer (eg. Radom), however, compared to other voivodeships like Podlasie and Subcarpathian Voivodeship the income is higher by almost half. Oliszydlowski 18:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Statistical division since 2020 [1].Xx236 (talk) 08:46, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've heard about the decision, however, it is going to be implied in 2020 so we can mention that in the body. Oliszydlowski 18:52, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The new division will be since 2018 not 2020: http://stat.gov.pl/statystyka-regionalna/jednostki-terytorialne/klasyfikacja-nuts/rewizja-klasyfikacji-nuts-2016/ Aotearoa (talk) 09:57, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Masovian Voivodeship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]